Search results
Create the page "SL5 WNs" on this wiki!
- ...ancaster's older cluster. First issue was cvmfs timeouts - linked to older WNs being overloaded. Second issue is cream CE losing track of jobs in the batc ...one CE already converted and two more about to fall. Make sure you get the WNs too! On Hod (should really be In Progress) (12/5)184 KB (30,332 words) - 17:18, 16 December 2014
- * the full compiler suite (c/c++ and fortran) should be installed in the WNs, including all the compat-gcc-32* and the SL_libg2c.a_change packages in S * for SL5 nodes please refer to https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/Atlas/RPMCompatS78 KB (13,056 words) - 13:44, 23 April 2024
- * Status of WNs in CVMFS ...tory was becoming harder to keep up to date, bringing the effective EOL of SL5 closer for the community46 KB (5,846 words) - 07:57, 9 March 2015
- ...2004 to use dual-Xeon servers (2.0 GHz, 2 GB, no hyperthreading), with the WNs replaced in 2008 by a pair reused from Argo. GreenStripe was retired in Aug <B>Upgrade to 64-bit DPM</B>: Install generic SL5.7 OS + DAG repo, NTP etc.40 KB (6,398 words) - 09:45, 8 November 2017
- ... also notes - what's getting loaded and causing the problem - Batch, CE or WNs?). Kashif reckons the argus server, and suggests a handy glexec time test w Although AFAICS there is no urgent need to upgrade tarball WNs.117 KB (18,736 words) - 11:05, 4 January 2016
- * Glasgow WNs and gcc-gfortran issue (masking user setup problems?) ...odes have their httpd daemons crash on them (they're up to date, but still SL5), which may or may not be related. In Progress (19/1)44 KB (5,505 words) - 10:46, 26 January 2015
- ...tory was becoming harder to keep up to date, bringing the effective EOL of SL5 closer for the community * Keep watching paikiti - WNs are popping up (seemingly) unpatched at some sites!48 KB (6,051 words) - 10:02, 16 February 2015
- ...tory was becoming harder to keep up to date, bringing the effective EOL of SL5 closer for the community * Keep watching paikiti - WNs are popping up (seemingly) unpatched at some sites!45 KB (5,650 words) - 15:12, 20 February 2015
- * Winnie has an issue in that 'SL5 (works) vs SL6 (not) emi-3 UI'. ...e to make it mandatory for sites to download and run Pakiti on highlighted WNs. ([https://indico.egi.eu/indico/getFile.py/access?contribId=2&resId=0&mater43 KB (5,265 words) - 10:52, 6 April 2015
- * Status of WNs in CVMFS ... as a byproduct of adding CentOS 7 to UMD. NGIs to make a note if extended SL5 support is required.48 KB (6,074 words) - 10:36, 16 March 2015
- * Status of WNs in CVMFS ... as a byproduct of adding CentOS 7 to UMD. NGIs to make a note if extended SL5 support is required.44 KB (5,438 words) - 08:48, 23 March 2015
- * Status of WNs in CVMFS ... as a byproduct of adding CentOS 7 to UMD. NGIs to make a note if extended SL5 support is required.44 KB (5,487 words) - 08:53, 30 March 2015
- * Winnie has an issue in that 'SL5 (works) vs SL6 (not) emi-3 UI'. ...e to make it mandatory for sites to download and run Pakiti on highlighted WNs. ([https://indico.egi.eu/indico/getFile.py/access?contribId=2&resId=0&mater44 KB (5,515 words) - 13:09, 12 April 2015
- * Winnie has an issue in that 'SL5 (works) vs SL6 (not) emi-3 UI'. ...e to make it mandatory for sites to download and run Pakiti on highlighted WNs. ([https://indico.egi.eu/indico/getFile.py/access?contribId=2&resId=0&mater49 KB (6,238 words) - 08:07, 18 April 2015
- ** Have no way to probe specific WNs. Proposed pakiti client run manually. (More UK feedback given). * UMD support for SL5/SL646 KB (5,803 words) - 11:48, 16 May 2015
- ** Have no way to probe specific WNs. Proposed pakiti client run manually. (More UK feedback given). * UMD support for SL5/SL646 KB (5,732 words) - 18:32, 23 May 2015
- ...ood. mc15 (mcore) running well. High-level trigger repro 1st week done. T0 WNs slow perhaps due to OpenStack update. FTS bring online daemons issue. * David updated the UK SL5 response.43 KB (5,391 words) - 15:50, 14 June 2015
- ...ood. mc15 (mcore) running well. High-level trigger repro 1st week done. T0 WNs slow perhaps due to OpenStack update. FTS bring online daemons issue. ...many services, and for each service if still needed on SL5, if upgrades on SL5 services are expected). [https://wiki.egi.eu/wiki/SL5_retirement A wiki has45 KB (5,632 words) - 13:32, 21 June 2015
- ...many services, and for each service if still needed on SL5, if upgrades on SL5 services are expected). [https://wiki.egi.eu/wiki/SL5_retirement A wiki has * David updated the UK SL5 response.45 KB (5,742 words) - 21:15, 5 July 2015
- * EGI: How many apel-publishers on sl5 in your NGI? (Instances in GOC-DB registered as glite-APEL.) ...esting purposes, in dual-stack mode (IPv4 and IPv6). LSF 9 upgrade of the WNs is in QA testing.47 KB (5,899 words) - 20:49, 6 December 2015
- * Decommissioning of SL5 ** SL5 services must be decommissioned by end of April 2016; broadcast at December47 KB (5,834 words) - 10:11, 11 January 2016
- * EGI: How many apel-publishers on sl5 in your NGI? (Instances in GOC-DB registered as glite-APEL.) ...ashboard/ngi/NGI_UK/tab/sites/filter/operators/page/sites EGI monitoring]. WNs, as tested by the monitoring, may be less vulnerable than affected middlewa44 KB (5,454 words) - 14:43, 17 December 2015
- * EGI: How many apel-publishers on sl5 in your NGI? (Instances in GOC-DB registered as glite-APEL.) * Decommissioning of SL553 KB (6,852 words) - 11:31, 21 December 2015
- * EGI: How many apel-publishers on sl5 in your NGI? (Instances in GOC-DB registered as glite-APEL.) * Decommissioning of SL553 KB (6,920 words) - 15:52, 4 January 2016
- * Decommissioning of SL5 ** SL5 services must be decommissioned by end of April 2016; broadcast at December51 KB (6,516 words) - 23:59, 18 January 2016
- * Luke:Kernel 4.5 on SL 6 WNs ** SL5 decommissioning (EGI, April 30, 2016). SL5 'ops' service probes will get CRITICAL. The whole retirement process is tra46 KB (5,853 words) - 07:32, 9 May 2016
- * Luke:Kernel 4.5 on SL 6 WNs ** SL5 decommissioning (EGI, April 30, 2016). SL5 'ops' service probes will get CRITICAL. The whole retirement process is tra46 KB (5,853 words) - 07:33, 9 May 2016
- * SL5 NGI SAMs can be decommissioned * SL5 report submitted47 KB (5,958 words) - 09:02, 15 October 2016
- * SL5 NGI SAMs can be decommissioned * SL5 report submitted54 KB (7,110 words) - 14:59, 10 October 2016
- * SL5 NGI SAMs can be decommissioned * SL5 report submitted50 KB (6,392 words) - 08:14, 23 October 2016
- * SL5 NGI SAMs can be decommissioned * SL5 report submitted50 KB (6,401 words) - 08:48, 31 October 2016
- * SL5 NGI SAMs can be decommissioned * SL5 report submitted51 KB (6,619 words) - 11:34, 7 November 2016
- * We are down to a few SL5 services. ...ading for EGI-SVG-2016-11476 have now been ticketed by EGI CSIRT. Although WNs not thought to be vulnerable they are asked to be upgraded as indicator of52 KB (6,786 words) - 05:33, 14 November 2016
- * the full compiler suite (c/c++ and fortran) should be installed in the WNs, including all the compat-gcc-32* and the SL_libg2c.a_change packages in S * for SL5 nodes please refer to https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/Atlas/RPMCompatS77 KB (12,989 words) - 12:01, 19 August 2022
