|
|
| Line 29: |
Line 29: |
| | | 25-012-2024 | | | 25-012-2024 |
| | | Template | | | Template |
| − |
| |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |O-120605-01
| |
| − | | Document how to use robot certificates to perform routine tasks without regular human intervention.
| |
| − | | Jens Jensen
| |
| − | | 06-06-2012
| |
| − | | Closed
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | | T2k and snoplus should probably be doing this to routinely move their data. It would be useful to have it documented. 2013-08-20: Jeremy to chase up. (update 21/01/14 follow up at subsequent meeting with Jens)
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |O-120605-03
| |
| − | | Document how to renew a server's grid certificate without loading it into a browser.
| |
| − | | Jens Jensen, John Kewley
| |
| − | | 06-06-2012
| |
| − | | Closed
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | | If sysadmin A renews a server's certificate on a Friday, then goes on holiday, it would be useful for sysadmin B to deploy the newly renewed certificate. For renewal, you could try this: [https://github.com/sfayer/cert_sorcerer/blob/master/README README] [https://github.com/sfayer/cert_sorcerer/blob/master/QUICKSTART QUICKSTART] - that's what we use at Imperial. (update 21/01/14 follow up at subsequent meeting with Jens)
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |O-130513-01
| |
| − | | Explore possibilities for LFC backup at a Tier-2
| |
| − | | Ops Team
| |
| − | | 2013-06-14
| |
| − | | Closed? (Might be less relevant now)
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | | Oracle expertise may be needed. Ian Collier volunteered to confirm this at the Tier 1. (update 21/01/2014, following internal discussions may have this at RAL site, possible Daresbury, Jeremy will follow this up)
| |
| − | |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |O-130528-01
| |
| − | | Plan out the future of CE/Batch System integration. Torque/maui are not supported by EGI. Layout an agenda with proposals.
| |
| − | | Jeremy, Alessandra
| |
| − | | 2013-05-20
| |
| − | | Closed
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | | 2014-03-14 After the pre-GDB on batch systems Alessandra created a [https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/LCG/BatchSystemComparison batch system comparison table] in the GDB twiki area
| |
| − | |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |O-130820-01
| |
| − | | Explore LFC/SE consistency checking status and develop tools if needed.
| |
| − | | Sam
| |
| − | | 2013-08-20
| |
| − | | Closed - see below
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | | Examining possibility of generalising Biomed tool https://github.com/frmichel/biomed-support-tools/blob/master/SE/consistency/diff-dpm-lfc.sh. Exploring status of the SYNCAT (SEMsg) Working Group via Fabrizio Furano. (Placeholder update 21/01/14, discussed that there may be a need to have a tool and should maybe talk to other VOs, Jeremy said he would update this action)
| |
| − | |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |O-140121-01
| |
| − | | Follow up on benchmarking of sites following SL6 upgrade
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | | Closed
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |O-140121-02
| |
| − | | Progression to using backup VOMS servers
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | | Closed
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |O-140225-01
| |
| − | |Sites to fill in Batch System Status table
| |
| − | |Various
| |
| − | |11/3/14
| |
| − | |Closed
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |https://www.gridpp.ac.uk/wiki/Batch_system_status still needs filling in by Brunel, Lancaster, RHUL, UCL, Sheffield, Birmingham, RALPP and Sussex.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |O-140225-02
| |
| − | |ILC software area migration to cvmfs
| |
| − | |Sites supporting ILC
| |
| − | |4/3/14
| |
| − | |Closed
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |https://ggus.eu/ws/ticket_info.php?ticket=101502 Sites should move to using cvmfs for ILC or reconsider their support. Will review in next meeting and decide if child tickets are needed.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |O-140225-03
| |
| − | |Redistribute Perfsonar Documentation
| |
| − | |Jeremy, Duncan or Steve
| |
| − | |4/3/14
| |
| − | |Closed
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |Sites have asked for Perfsonar documentation, particularly that pertaining to the reinstall, upgrade and mesh deployment, to be redistributed on TB-SUPPORT.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |O-140506-01
| |
| − | |Investigate best procedure for managing top bdiis during network outages/interventions
| |
| − | |Gareth Smith
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |Closed
| |
| − | |
| |
| − | |Following the network intervention at RAL recently the 3 Top BDIIs displayed different information but all claimed to be authoritative.
| |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Works left -> right. EVO meeting = 1: F2F meeting = 5
IN: Stephen=8 Pete=8 Chris=8 Andrew=8 Kashif=9 David=9 Jeremy=9 Daniela=9 David=9 Alessandra=9 Ewan=9 Duncan=9 Sam=9 Wahid=10 Matt=10 Brian=11
OUT: Mark=6
Minutes can be found at: UKI-ROC agenda
| Action ID
|
Action description
|
Owner
|
Target date
|
Status
|
Date closed
|
Notes
|
| O-120410-01
|
Some Action
|
Some person
|
25-012-2012
|
Some status
|
25-012-2024
|
Template
|
| O-140506-02
|
Puppet config to make cvmfs changes once for all relevant VOs
|
Kashif
|
|
Open ?
|
|
Currently, when updating cvmfs information, it has to be done per VO rather than doing it once which then propagates as appropriate.
|
| O-140701-01
|
Dirac File Catalogue Consistency checking - evaluate status
|
Sam
|
2014-07-01
|
Open
|
|
Now that small VOs are being recommended to use Dirac's file management tools, we should check that the functionality is there for proper consistency management.
|
|
| 0-140812-01
|
RIPE probe deployment
|
Jeremy (?)
|
2014-08-20
|
Open
|
|
Discuss deployment of RIPE probes with sites at GridPP 33
|
|
| O-140812-02
|
Sites to provide Ewan with ARC CE mysterious banning behaviour info
|
Ewan (coordinating)
|
2014-08-26
|
Open
|
|
Ewan sent email request to TB-SUPPORT ("ARC CE user mapping config"), sites with ARC CE's need to respond.
|
|
| O-140812-03
|
Prepare to talk to JANET at GridPP33
|
All
|
2014-08-21
|
Open
|
|
Sites should have questions, queries and suggestions ready to make most of the meeting with JANET reps. Perhaps local network admins would like a question asked? The setup of a new IPv6 SIG was suggested as one.
|
|
|
