Difference between revisions of "VO Cleanup Campaign"

From GridPP Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Added the link to the development accounting portal.)
 
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
It is possible to get a dynamically-populated set of check-boxes by using the [http://accounting-devel.egi.eu/egi.php?SubRegion=1.65 development accounting portal], which may be useful in tracking VO usage.
 
It is possible to get a dynamically-populated set of check-boxes by using the [http://accounting-devel.egi.eu/egi.php?SubRegion=1.65 development accounting portal], which may be useful in tracking VO usage.
 
+
https://accounting.egi.eu/
 
{|border="1" cellpadding="1"
 
{|border="1" cellpadding="1"
|+VOs listed in the [http://accounting.egi.eu/egi.php?SubRegion=1.65 EGI accounting portal] for NGI_UK
+
|+VOs listed in the [https://accounting.egi.eu/wlcg/country/United%20Kingdom/ EGI accounting portal] for NGI_UK
  
 
|-style="background:#7C8AAF;color:white"
 
|-style="background:#7C8AAF;color:white"

Latest revision as of 11:44, 24 February 2020

This page is for monitoring progress on the GridPP VO clean-up campaign. A number of VOs listed in the EGI accounting portal for NGI UK are not accounted for in the GridPP Approved VO list. Many are due to spelling mistakes or test VOs that are probably unncessary. A clean-up would be a useful exercise, not least if we find VOs that are using GridPP resources that we can list as non-LHC users!

Update: a few GGUS tickets have revealed that the listing of defunct VOs is a "feature". All VOs listed have, in fact, been used in the past. The VOs check-box list is populated from the entire history of the NGI, so purging them would actually be a bad idea.

It is possible to get a dynamically-populated set of check-boxes by using the development accounting portal, which may be useful in tracking VO usage. https://accounting.egi.eu/

VOs listed in the EGI accounting portal for NGI_UK
Name Full name Website Contact Notes
20053
GLOW
None
aforti
bio Duplicate of biomed?
calce calice spelling mistake?
camnt camont spelling mistake?
camonlocalUser Defunct camont VO?
comet.j-parc.jp
compchem
dames.org.uk
dech
eela
enroller.org.uk
euindia
example Test VO to be removed?
fuson fusion speeing mistake?
gilda
glast.org
glbio
gplsuprb
grdpp gridpp spelling mistake?
gridcc
h1
icecube
igmm_mg
imain
lt2-na48
manmace
middleware


monitoring.ngs.ac.uk
neurogrid.incf.org
ngs
oxg
physics_nesc
prod.vo.eu-eela.eu
see_imns
sixt Duplicate of vo.sixt.cern.ch?
southgd Duplicate of vo.southgrid.ac.uk?
southgrid Duplicate of vo.southgrid.ac.uk?
testvo.physics.ox.ac.uk Still required?
ukqcd Duplicate of ukqcd.vo.gridpp.ac.uk
ukqcd.vo.gridpp.ac.uk
unknown  ???
vo.earthsci.ac.uk
vo.gear.cern.ch
vo.helio-vo.eu
vo.nanocmos.ac.uk
vo.optics.ac.uk
vo.panda.gsi.de
vo.rhone-alpes.idgrilles.fr
vo.ssp.ac.uk