Difference between revisions of "VO Cleanup Campaign"
From GridPP Wiki
(Created the page.) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This page is for monitoring progress on the GridPP VO clean-up campaign. A number of VOs listed in the EGI accounting portal for NGI UK are not accounted for in the [[GridPP_approved_VOs|GridPP Approved VO list]]. Many are due to spelling mistakes or test VOs that are probably unncessary. A clean-up would be a useful exercise, not least if we find VOs that are using GridPP resources that we can list as non-LHC users! | This page is for monitoring progress on the GridPP VO clean-up campaign. A number of VOs listed in the EGI accounting portal for NGI UK are not accounted for in the [[GridPP_approved_VOs|GridPP Approved VO list]]. Many are due to spelling mistakes or test VOs that are probably unncessary. A clean-up would be a useful exercise, not least if we find VOs that are using GridPP resources that we can list as non-LHC users! | ||
| + | '''Update''': a few GGUS tickets have revealed that the listing of defunct VOs is a "feature". All VOs listed have, in fact, been used in the past. The VOs check-box list is populated from the entire history of the NGI, so purging them would actually be a bad idea. | ||
| + | |||
| + | It is possible to get a dynamically-populated set of check-boxes by using the [http://accounting-devel.egi.eu/egi.php?SubRegion=1.65 development accounting portal], which may be useful in tracking VO usage. | ||
| + | https://accounting.egi.eu/ | ||
{|border="1" cellpadding="1" | {|border="1" cellpadding="1" | ||
| − | |+VOs listed in the [ | + | |+VOs listed in the [https://accounting.egi.eu/wlcg/country/United%20Kingdom/ EGI accounting portal] for NGI_UK |
|-style="background:#7C8AAF;color:white" | |-style="background:#7C8AAF;color:white" | ||
| Line 43: | Line 47: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| − | | | + | | Duplicate of biomed? |
|- | |- | ||
| Line 50: | Line 54: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| − | | | + | | calice spelling mistake? |
|- | |- | ||
| Line 57: | Line 61: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| − | | | + | | camont spelling mistake? |
|- | |- | ||
| Line 64: | Line 68: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| − | | | + | | Defunct camont VO? |
|- | |- | ||
| Line 120: | Line 124: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| − | | | + | | Test VO to be removed? |
|- | |- | ||
| Line 127: | Line 131: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| − | | | + | | fusion speeing mistake? |
|- | |- | ||
| Line 162: | Line 166: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| − | | | + | | gridpp spelling mistake? |
|- | |- | ||
| Line 220: | Line 224: | ||
| | | | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 281: | Line 279: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| − | | | + | | Duplicate of vo.sixt.cern.ch? |
|- | |- | ||
| Line 288: | Line 286: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| − | | | + | | Duplicate of vo.southgrid.ac.uk? |
|- | |- | ||
| Line 295: | Line 293: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| − | | | + | | Duplicate of vo.southgrid.ac.uk? |
|- | |- | ||
| Line 302: | Line 300: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| − | | | + | | Still required? |
|- | |- | ||
| Line 309: | Line 307: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| − | | | + | | Duplicate of ukqcd.vo.gridpp.ac.uk |
|- | |- | ||
| Line 323: | Line 321: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| − | | | + | | ??? |
|- | |- | ||
Latest revision as of 11:44, 24 February 2020
This page is for monitoring progress on the GridPP VO clean-up campaign. A number of VOs listed in the EGI accounting portal for NGI UK are not accounted for in the GridPP Approved VO list. Many are due to spelling mistakes or test VOs that are probably unncessary. A clean-up would be a useful exercise, not least if we find VOs that are using GridPP resources that we can list as non-LHC users!
Update: a few GGUS tickets have revealed that the listing of defunct VOs is a "feature". All VOs listed have, in fact, been used in the past. The VOs check-box list is populated from the entire history of the NGI, so purging them would actually be a bad idea.
It is possible to get a dynamically-populated set of check-boxes by using the development accounting portal, which may be useful in tracking VO usage. https://accounting.egi.eu/
| Name | Full name | Website | Contact | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20053 | ||||
| GLOW | ||||
| None | ||||
| aforti | ||||
| bio | Duplicate of biomed? | |||
| calce | calice spelling mistake? | |||
| camnt | camont spelling mistake? | |||
| camonlocalUser | Defunct camont VO? | |||
| comet.j-parc.jp | ||||
| compchem | ||||
| dames.org.uk | ||||
| dech | ||||
| eela | ||||
| enroller.org.uk | ||||
| euindia | ||||
| example | Test VO to be removed? | |||
| fuson | fusion speeing mistake? | |||
| gilda | ||||
| glast.org | ||||
| glbio | ||||
| gplsuprb | ||||
| grdpp | gridpp spelling mistake? | |||
| gridcc | ||||
| h1 | ||||
| icecube | ||||
| igmm_mg | ||||
| imain | ||||
| lt2-na48 | ||||
| manmace | ||||
| middleware |
| |||
| monitoring.ngs.ac.uk | ||||
| neurogrid.incf.org | ||||
| ngs | ||||
| oxg | ||||
| physics_nesc | ||||
| prod.vo.eu-eela.eu | ||||
| see_imns | ||||
| sixt | Duplicate of vo.sixt.cern.ch? | |||
| southgd | Duplicate of vo.southgrid.ac.uk? | |||
| southgrid | Duplicate of vo.southgrid.ac.uk? | |||
| testvo.physics.ox.ac.uk | Still required? | |||
| ukqcd | Duplicate of ukqcd.vo.gridpp.ac.uk | |||
| ukqcd.vo.gridpp.ac.uk | ||||
| unknown | ??? | |||
| vo.earthsci.ac.uk | ||||
| vo.gear.cern.ch | ||||
| vo.helio-vo.eu | ||||
| vo.nanocmos.ac.uk | ||||
| vo.optics.ac.uk | ||||
| vo.panda.gsi.de | ||||
| vo.rhone-alpes.idgrilles.fr | ||||
| vo.ssp.ac.uk |
