Difference between revisions of "UKI-SCOTGRID-ECDF"
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 14:24, 25 July 2012
Contents
UKI-SCOTGRID-ECDF
Topic: HEPSPEC06
| OS+cores,Bits | OS | Kernel | 32/64 | mem | gcc | Benchmark | Total | Per Core |
| Dual CPU, Dual Core, Intel Xeon 5160 | SL4 | 2.6.9-67.0.22.ELsmp | 64bit | 8Gb | 3.4.6-10.x86_64 | S2k6 all_cpp 64bit | 44.4 | 11.1 |
| Dual CPU, Dual Core, Intel Xeon 5160@3.0GHz | SL4 | 2.6.9-67.0.22.ELsmp | 32compat on 64 | 8Gb | 3.4.6-10.x86_64 | S2k6 all_cpp 32bit | 38.31 | 9.57 |
| Dual CPU, Dual Core, Intel Xeon 5160@3.0GHz no batch system | SL5 | 2.6.18-53.1.4.el5 | 32compat on 64 | 8Gb | 4.1.2-44.el5.x86_64 | S2k6 all_cpp 32bit | 40.98 | 10.24 |
| Dual CPU, Dual Core, Intel Xeon 5160@3.0GHz no batch system | SL4 | 2.6.9-67.0.22.ELsmp | 32compat on 64 | 8Gb | 3.4.6-10.x86_64 | S2k6 all_cpp 32bit | 39.08 | 9.77 |
| Dual CPU, Dual Core, Intel Xeon 5160@3.0GHz no batch, no GPFS | SL5 | 2.6.18-53.1.4.el5 | 32compat on 64 | 8Gb | 4.1.2-44.el5.x86_64 | S2k6 all_cpp 32bit | 41.19 | 10.30 |
| Dual CPU, Quad Core, Intel Xeon X5450@3.0GHz | SL4 | 2.6.9-67.0.22.ELsmp | 32compat on 64 | 16Gb | 3.4.6-10.x86_64 | S2k6 all_cpp 32bit | 71.17 | 8.89 |
| Dual CPU, Quad Core, Intel Xeon X5450@3.0GHz no batch, no GPFS | SL4 | 2.6.9-67.0.22.ELsmp | 32compat on 64 | 16Gb | 3.4.6-10.x86_64 | S2k6 all_cpp 32bit | 71.62 | 8.95 |
| Dual CPU, Quad Core, Intel Xeon X5450@3.0GHz no batch, no GPFS | SL5 | 2.6.18-53.1.4.el5 | 32compat on 64 | 16Gb | 4.1.2-44.el5.x86_64 | S2k6 all_cpp 32bit | 76.24 | 9.53 |
Topic: Middleware_transition
gLite3.2/EMI
ARGUS
Look to deploy over the next couple of months. Place in production once verifed support.
BDII_site
glite-BDII_site-3.2.11-1
CE (CREAM/LCG)
2 x glite 3.2 CreamCE (one virtual based, one real), 1 LCG-CE
Virtual instance suffering from performance issues, likely to migrate this service to a non-virtual host.
LCG-CE host will be decomissioned when two stable CreamCE services are in place.
glexec
No plans yet. Will look to deploy gLExec-WN tarball when officially available and once gLExec is fully validated by ATLAS and LHCb.
SE
production SE: SL4 glite 3.1 (plan to move to SL5 glite 3.2 before the end of the year)
test SE: EMI 1.0 SL5
UI
No UI - we use our local T3 setup to get user level access to grid services.
WN
Use tarball version. Plan to upgrade 3.2.11 in the next couple of months.
Comments
Topic: Protected_Site_networking
- (shared) cluster on own subnet
- WAN: 10Gb uplink from Eddie to SRIF
- 20Gb SRIF@Bush to SRIF@KB 4Gb to SRIF@KB to SRIF@AT 1Gb from SRIF@AT to SPOP2
- weakest link but dedicated; not saturating and could be upgraded
- 10Gb from SPOP2 to SJ5
Topic: Resiliency_and_Disaster_Planning
- This section intentionally left blank
Topic: SL4_Survey_August_2011
- This section intentionally left blank
Topic: Site_information
Memory
1. Real physical memory per job slot:
2 Gb
2. Real memory limit beyond which a job is killed:
None.
3. Virtual memory limit beyond which a job is killed:
Depends on the VO - 6Gb for ATLAS Production jobs, 3Gb for everyone else (as they've not had a problem yet).
4. Number of cores per WN:
4 or 8 (roughly the same number nodes with each, as dual-processor (either dual or quad core)).
Comments:
Network
1. WAN problems experienced in the last year:
2. Problems/issues seen with site networking:
3. Forward look:
Comments:
Topic: Site_status_and_plans
SL5 WNs
Current status (date): Upgraded on 29th Oct.
Planned upgrade:
Comments:Problem with LHCb SAM test (script looks in /etc/redhat-release). Seemingly not affecting actual jobs (confirming)
ATLAS pilot jobs issue (work in progress) (SAM tests and SL test passing).
SRM
Current status (date): Running DPM 1.8.0-1 for a long time.
Planned upgrade:
Comments:
SCAS/glexec
Current status (date): Not deployed
Planned deployment: None planned. Systems team do not object to deployment - but will need a stable tarball install that works on SGE.
Comments:
CREAM CE
Current status (date): Deployed
Planned deployment: Deployed as a replacement to LCG-CE.
Comments:
