Difference between revisions of "Operations Bulletin Latest"
(→) |
(→) |
||
Line 401: | Line 401: | ||
'''RALPP'''<br /> | '''RALPP'''<br /> | ||
https://ggus.eu/index.php?mode=ticket_info&ticket_id=102990 (3/4)<br /> | https://ggus.eu/index.php?mode=ticket_info&ticket_id=102990 (3/4)<br /> | ||
− | Duncan's unending perfsonar vigilance discovered a a problem with the RALPP latency box. Ian reports firewall problems that have been solved, so it looks like this one can be closed (if all is well). In progress (can be closed) (4/4) | + | Duncan's unending perfsonar vigilance discovered a a problem with the RALPP latency box. Ian reports firewall problems that have been solved, so it looks like this one can be closed (if all is well). In progress (can be closed) (4/4) ''Not quite out of the woods yet after all, Ian spotted and fixed a few more problems, Duncan has spotted something else away.'' |
https://ggus.eu/index.php?mode=ticket_info&ticket_id=102953 (24/3)<br /> | https://ggus.eu/index.php?mode=ticket_info&ticket_id=102953 (24/3)<br /> | ||
Line 408: | Line 408: | ||
'''OXFORD'''<br /> | '''OXFORD'''<br /> | ||
https://ggus.eu/index.php?mode=ticket_info&ticket_id=103027 (5/4)<br /> | https://ggus.eu/index.php?mode=ticket_info&ticket_id=103027 (5/4)<br /> | ||
− | LHCB pilots aborting, Kashif asks if the problem persists, the ticket fairy set the ticket to Waiting for Reply (5/4) | + | LHCB pilots aborting, Kashif asks if the problem persists, the ticket fairy set the ticket to Waiting for Reply (5/4) ''SOLVED'' |
https://ggus.eu/index.php?mode=ticket_info&ticket_id=102469 (19/3)<br /> | https://ggus.eu/index.php?mode=ticket_info&ticket_id=102469 (19/3)<br /> | ||
Line 419: | Line 419: | ||
'''GLASGOW'''<br /> | '''GLASGOW'''<br /> | ||
https://ggus.eu/index.php?mode=ticket_info&ticket_id=102914 (1/4)<br /> | https://ggus.eu/index.php?mode=ticket_info&ticket_id=102914 (1/4)<br /> | ||
− | An atlas ticket, detailing some odd transfer behaviour for some files, likely attributed to some off tcp window settings on a disk server. There was a similar looking (although possibly not identical) problem at RHUL (https://ggus.eu/index.php?mode=ticket_info&ticket_id=102311). Some interesting stuff. In progress (4/4) | + | An atlas ticket, detailing some odd transfer behaviour for some files, likely attributed to some off tcp window settings on a disk server. There was a similar looking (although possibly not identical) problem at RHUL (https://ggus.eu/index.php?mode=ticket_info&ticket_id=102311). Some interesting stuff. In progress (4/4) ''Sam updated the ticket, with no more "sub-optimally tuned" disk pools. I think it should be set to waiting for reply though'' |
https://ggus.eu/index.php?mode=ticket_info&ticket_id=102202 (14/3)<br /> | https://ggus.eu/index.php?mode=ticket_info&ticket_id=102202 (14/3)<br /> | ||
− | Not as interesting, Glasgow's EMI upgrade ticket. Chugging along, last word was from David a little while back about having watching some atlas canary jobs running on the EMI3 worker nodes. How did these pan out? In progress (27/3) | + | Not as interesting, Glasgow's EMI upgrade ticket. Chugging along, last word was from David a little while back about having watching some atlas canary jobs running on the EMI3 worker nodes. How did these pan out? In progress (27/3) ''Gareth updates that progress is slow but steady, draining nodes is taking a while.'' |
https://ggus.eu/index.php?mode=ticket_info&ticket_id=101565 (26/2)<br /> | https://ggus.eu/index.php?mode=ticket_info&ticket_id=101565 (26/2)<br /> | ||
Line 465: | Line 465: | ||
'''QMUL'''<br /> | '''QMUL'''<br /> | ||
https://ggus.eu/index.php?mode=ticket_info&ticket_id=103028 (6/4)<br /> | https://ggus.eu/index.php?mode=ticket_info&ticket_id=103028 (6/4)<br /> | ||
− | Atlas seeing production jobs failing due to pilot errors. Chris asked if production job options have changed recently? The ticket fairy struck again, setting the ticket to Waiting for reply (although he's less sure if that was the intention of Chris' reply). In progress (7/4) | + | Atlas seeing production jobs failing due to pilot errors. Chris asked if production job options have changed recently? The ticket fairy struck again, setting the ticket to Waiting for reply (although he's less sure if that was the intention of Chris' reply). In progress (7/4) ''Atlas replied saying that they don't think there has been any job changes. Full prod disk is making things even cloudier, but Dan has asked for clarification on what an error message actually means - "!!FAILED!!1999!! Job killed by signal 24: Signal handler has set job result to FAILED, ec = 1204" '' |
https://ggus.eu/index.php?mode=ticket_info&ticket_id=101639 (26/2)<br /> | https://ggus.eu/index.php?mode=ticket_info&ticket_id=101639 (26/2)<br /> | ||
Line 474: | Line 474: | ||
'''IMPERIAL'''<br /> | '''IMPERIAL'''<br /> | ||
https://ggus.eu/index.php?mode=ticket_info&ticket_id=102888 (1/4)<br /> | https://ggus.eu/index.php?mode=ticket_info&ticket_id=102888 (1/4)<br /> | ||
− | Biomed asked for access to their cvmfs repo to be rolled out at IC. Daniela has said fine but asked that they completely migrate to it within 3 months (nfs or cvmfs). Daniela has completed the rollout and asked biomed to test. Waiting for reply (7/4) | + | Biomed asked for access to their cvmfs repo to be rolled out at IC. Daniela has said fine but asked that they completely migrate to it within 3 months (nfs or cvmfs). Daniela has completed the rollout and asked biomed to test. Waiting for reply (7/4) ''Biomed have got back saying that they've launched some test jobs, but expect it might take a while for them to run. I think they also were kinda asking if Imperial would give them some leyway on moving wholey to cvmfs.'' |
'''EFDA-JET'''<br /> | '''EFDA-JET'''<br /> | ||
Line 488: | Line 488: | ||
https://ggus.eu/index.php?mode=ticket_info&ticket_id=98249 (21/10/13)<br /> | https://ggus.eu/index.php?mode=ticket_info&ticket_id=98249 (21/10/13)<br /> | ||
− | CVMFS for SNO+. Matt reported that the collaboration has given permission to have their software on cvmfs, and hoped to have tarballs ready for last week. Has there been any progress offline? In progress (26/3) | + | CVMFS for SNO+. Matt reported that the collaboration has given permission to have their software on cvmfs, and hoped to have tarballs ready for last week. Has there been any progress offline? In progress (26/3) ''Update - Squire Whyntie informed me that this is being actively worked on offline, with Tom kindly providing assisstance.'' |
https://ggus.eu/index.php?mode=ticket_info&ticket_id=101079 (9/2)<br /> | https://ggus.eu/index.php?mode=ticket_info&ticket_id=101079 (9/2)<br /> |
Revision as of 09:57, 8 April 2014
Week commencing 7th April 2014 |
Task Areas |
|
|
Meeting Summaries |
|
|