Difference between revisions of "GridPP5 Tier2 plans"
From GridPP Wiki
(→Sites batch system status) |
(→Sites batch system status) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
== Sites batch system status == | == Sites batch system status == | ||
| − | This page has been | + | This page has been set up to collect information from GridPP sites regarding their batch, middleware and storage system plans. The information will help with wider considerations and strategy. The table seeks the following: |
# Site name | # Site name | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
# Shared filesystem? (Do users rely on a shared filesystem? e.g. Lustre. i.e. that couldn’t be replaced with local filesystems on worker nodes. Which one?) | # Shared filesystem? (Do users rely on a shared filesystem? e.g. Lustre. i.e. that couldn’t be replaced with local filesystems on worker nodes. Which one?) | ||
# Non-LHC, non GridPP DIRAC VOs? (Do you support VOs, e.g. from EGI, that aren’t LHC experiments and don't use the GridPP DIRAC service. Please list the top 3.) | # Non-LHC, non GridPP DIRAC VOs? (Do you support VOs, e.g. from EGI, that aren’t LHC experiments and don't use the GridPP DIRAC service. Please list the top 3.) | ||
| + | # Storage system (dCache, DPM, StoRM) | ||
# Non-LHC storage? (Do you provide storage to non-LHC projects? Please list the top 3.) | # Non-LHC storage? (Do you provide storage to non-LHC projects? Please list the top 3.) | ||
| Line 25: | Line 26: | ||
|Shared filesystem? | |Shared filesystem? | ||
|Non-LHC, non GridPP DIRAC VOs? | |Non-LHC, non GridPP DIRAC VOs? | ||
| + | |Storage system | ||
|Non-LHC storage? | |Non-LHC storage? | ||
| − | |||
|. | |. | ||
|. | |. | ||
| Line 111: | Line 112: | ||
|No | |No | ||
|Biomed, ILC, Icecube | |Biomed, ILC, Icecube | ||
| − | | | + | |DPM |
|. | |. | ||
|. | |. | ||
Revision as of 10:23, 14 March 2017
Other links
Sites batch system status
This page has been set up to collect information from GridPP sites regarding their batch, middleware and storage system plans. The information will help with wider considerations and strategy. The table seeks the following:
- Site name
- Batch/CE system (the main batch system and CE you are intending to use in GridPP5. This might be one that you are testing as a replacement for, say, Torque/CREAM)
- Shared, non-CE? Yes/No (Is the batch system shared with users who don’t access it through the grid CE?)
- Shared filesystem? (Do users rely on a shared filesystem? e.g. Lustre. i.e. that couldn’t be replaced with local filesystems on worker nodes. Which one?)
- Non-LHC, non GridPP DIRAC VOs? (Do you support VOs, e.g. from EGI, that aren’t LHC experiments and don't use the GridPP DIRAC service. Please list the top 3.)
- Storage system (dCache, DPM, StoRM)
- Non-LHC storage? (Do you provide storage to non-LHC projects? Please list the top 3.)
| Site | Batch/CE system | Shared, non-CE? | Shared filesystem? | Non-LHC, non GridPP DIRAC VOs? | Storage system | Non-LHC storage? | . | . | Notes |
| UKI-LT2-Brunel | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | |
| UKI-LT2-IC-HEP | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
|
| UKI-LT2-QMUL | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | |
| UKI-LT2-RHUL | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
|
| UKI-NORTHGRID-LANCS-HEP | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | |
| UKI-NORTHGRID-LIV-HEP | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | |
| UKI-NORTHGRID-MAN-HEP | HTCondor/ARC | No | No | Biomed, ILC, Icecube | DPM | . | . | . |
|
| UKI-NORTHGRID-SHEF-HEP | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
|
| UKI-SCOTGRID-DURHAM | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
|
| UKI-SCOTGRID-ECDF | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
|
| UKI-SCOTGRID-GLASGOW | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | |
| UKI-SOUTHGRID-BHAM-HEP | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
|
| UKI-SOUTHGRID-BRIS | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
|
| UKI-SOUTHGRID-CAM-HEP | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | |
| UKI-SOUTHGRID-OX-HEP | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
|
| UKI-SOUTHGRID-RALPP | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
|
| UKI-SOUTHGRID-SUSX | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
|
